8th Annual Hong Kong Innovative Users Group Meeting
Results of Programme Evaluation
 
1. Programme organization
Grade Responses Percent Graph
15 58%
10 38%
1 4%
0 0%
0 0%
Total Number of Responses: 26

2. Programme publicity
Grade Responses Percent Graph
12 46%
13 50%
1 4%
0 0%
0 0%
Total Number of Responses: 26

3. Days for the programme
Grade Responses Percent Graph
4 15%
8 31%
10 38%
4 15%
0 0%
Total Number of Responses: 26

4. Time for presentations by individual libraries
Grade Responses Percent Graph
3 12%
10 38%
13 50%
0 0%
0 0%
Total Number of Responses: 26

5. Time for presentations by III
Grade Responses Percent Graph
1 4%
12 48%
10 40%
2 8%
0 0%
Total Number of Responses: 25

6. Time for III concurrent sessions
Grade Responses Percent Graph
4 17%
7 29%
6 25%
7 29%
0 0%
Total Number of Responses: 24

7. Presentations by individual libraries
Grade Responses Percent Graph
12 46%
9 35%
5 19%
0 0%
0 0%
Total Number of Responses: 26

8. Presentations by III
Grade Responses Percent Graph
4 16%
16 64%
5 20%
0 0%
0 0%
Total Number of Responses: 25

9. III concurrent sessions
Grade Responses Percent Graph
2 8%
11 46%
8 33%
3 13%
0 0%
Total Number of Responses: 24

10. Registration
Grade Responses Percent Graph
16 62%
8 31%
1 4%
1 4%
0 0%
Total Number of Responses: 26

11. Venue facilities
Grade Responses Percent Graph
17 65%
8 31%
0 0%
1 4%
0 0%
Total Number of Responses: 26

12. Conference lunch
Grade Responses Percent Graph
10 43%
9 39%
3 13%
1 4%
0 0%
Total Number of Responses: 23

13. Refreshments
Grade Responses Percent Graph
13 52%
9 36%
3 12%
0 0%
0 0%

Total Number of Responses: 25

 

Comments on III concurrent sessions:
  • Need more time for discussion.
  • Good panel members. Attended OPAC session,the venue should be smaller, so we could easier to talk to the stage.
  • Too short.
General comments and suggestions for improvement:
  • The best local presentations ever. Keep on.
  • Very good.
  • The topics presented by some libraries are alike. A more compact schedule is preferred, if there are not many presentations, it is better to shorten the duration to 1 day or 1 1/2 day.
  • Good Conference. However, there is no need to hold HKIUG very year. It seems that not many local libraries are interested in participating. It could be held say every two years instead. Some contents are not related to INNOPAC.

Back to HKIUG Homepage